
Framing Unity
Seokho Jeong’s Directorial Canvas in the Korean Art Scene
Words OSMAN CAN YEREBAKAN
Photography GLEESON PAULINO
OSMAN CAN YEREBAKAN: The crack imagery has been the epitome of your visual lexicon. Cracks or supposed blemishes have different philosophical connotations in different cultures. They are also results of experience, use, and chance. Let’s start with your journey into assuming cracks as part of your practice.
ADRIANA VAREJÃO: I was studying Chinese ceramics at the end of the 1980s. I came across a special Celadon piece from the 11th century Song Dynasty era with its surface totally cracked. This was an example of how they traditionally incorporated the cracking into the ceramic in very elaborate ways. The cracks are a very precious part of the philosophy of the ceramic but also a connection with the beginning of the language in China and the oracles’ reading of the cracks on turtles’ shells as pictograms.
At the same time, I was learning the history of calligraphy and the history of the language itself, as well as its poetry and connection to literature. In 1991, I spent three months in China, and I also visited a very important collection of Song-era pottery in London, perhaps the biggest one in the Western world. I also was interested in the Baroque which is in many ways totally on the opposite end. I decided to put these two ideas together and develop a technique on the canvas. I apply the plaster with glue to make the canvas smoother and easier to paint, and when I add more in quantity, it begins to crack. It cracks in order to find a balance.
OCY: There is a living, bodily element to these fissures; they are almost reminders of life.
AV: I incorporate the cracks into the tile paintings because they give a sense of the body over the surface—instead of being an imitation of the tile, it’s a recreation of it. Even today, many think my works are actually in ceramic, and they ask how I can burn such a big piece or ask what size oven I have at my studio. I like this misconception because my work is always simulating something else. I could be referencing meat, but I do not work with real meat and the same goes for tiles. Simulation is a strategy of Baroque.
OCY: From Baroque to Minimalism, various forms of expression find their way into your work. The styles also signify different periods in time. Do you see a parallel between time and form?
AV: I have always been interested in ceramics, tiles, and decorative arts in general, which reverberate but are not necessarily subject to the official timeline of art history. There is no hierarchy of movements within the decorative arts. When the Baroque comes from Europe to Latin America, for example, even as a persuasion strategy, it starts to incorporate many elements from the local culture, and somehow it ends up being swallowed and re-signified by these elements. There is a great deal of syncretism throughout Latin America, and this has always caught my attention.
In Cuba, author José Lezama Lima called Baroque the language of counter-conquest. When I was working for my show at the Gagosian in 2021, I wanted to move away from Portuguese tiles, so I looked into the geometric forms from Mexican talavera ceramics. Many years ago, in Mexico City, I came across the huge façade of a talavera ceramics factory covered with geometrical motifs. The whole history of forms from different times and places were put together on that huge wall, as in “The Aleph” by Jorge Luis Borges. There was Modernism, Minimalism, and geometry, but everything mixed with patterns of flowers and birds, which made it also about the history of decoration. I don’t mean to reference, let’s say, Ellsworth Kelly, but instead, talavera. The idea is to build a culture of forms through fragments of different cultures and times. When you talk about movements, they are static in terms of date and chronology, but this kind of thinking is more fluid—it doesn’t belong to any one specific moment.
OCY: There is a tension between order and eruption in your work, whether these cracks or references to the systematic nature of geometry. How does this tension create its own harmony?
AV: When I work with the idea of meat, I am working with a type of disorder, a wild surface that is very expressionist, which makes me feel less in control. And, yes, on the other end, there is the geometry of the grid in the tile works. I have this balance between two kinds of plasticity. Meat works have an element of reaction, or the cracks are eruptions, while the geometry of the grid makes a counterpoint.
OCY: Organic forms prompt a balance between abstraction and representation. An organic form may be abstract but also signals familiarity. How do you approach this duality in your work?
AV: When a surface works, I don’t control it very much—I pour a mixture over the canvas and wait until it cracks, so it’s improvisational. The abstract form of the cracks is what creates the painting. To find a good one, I might do twelve attempts on a large surface. But sometimes the crack makes a bad drawing, maybe too much plaster in the middle. Some breaks may be technically not what I desire, so this is a repeated system.
<Read the full interview from Issue Six>
Related Stories

Seokho Jeong’s Directorial Canvas in the Korean Art Scene

Painting the opaque, rendering desire

A practice irreducible to a single medium, time period, or voice

In Motion

Transformation of physical spaces

Opulent Justice
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Sign up to receive emails on exclusive newsletters, features, and more.
By sharing your email you agree to our Terms and Conditions. This site is also protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.